[E-voting] Source Code
evoting at gibiris.org
Mon Mar 22 20:42:25 GMT 2004
Aengus Lawlor wrote:
> Now you're catching on - your ability to read software doesn't add
> transparency, because you can't tell whether the software that you have
> vetted was the software that was actually used. You're still stuck with
> trusting someone else to implement the system.
The point I am trying to highlight is that the State would be in a
better position to vet and trust the code that implements the country's
election processes if it was to use a Free Software solution. As it
stands, all the Government knows is what the vendors are telling them
and what 6 commissioned reports told them. 6 commissioned reports, it
has been pointed out, that are not especially reliable in terms of coverage.
> (By the way, there are literally hundreds of thousands of Irish people
> who "trust" Minister Cullen when he says that the system works. If you
> think that a "my friends and family can take my word for it" trust model
> is good enough, then you've already conceded the issue).
Every day I read articles on web sites like OS News, Newsforge, The
Register, and so on, providing critical analysis of various software
applications. These critiques are performed by qualified professionals,
often commissioned in a free-lance manner by the editors of the sites in
questions. While I was pointing out that the average voter (whatever
that is) could ask some one they personally know who has examined the
source code of a Free Software solution, a logical extension of the
argument is that the editorial staff of organisations like The Irish
Times, The Irish Independent, The Star, RTÉ's Prime Time, etc. could
just as easily commission such examinations and publish them.
Everyone who cared would be informed.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.stdlib.net/pipermail/e-voting/attachments/20040322/7ceab0b7/signature.bin
More information about the E-voting