[E-voting] Diebold voting machines vulnerability
Casey, Dermot (GE Consumer Finance)
Dermot.Casey at ge.com
Wed Sep 1 15:41:03 IST 2004
There seems to be something screwy with the original link
Try this and scroll down for more details
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/?q=&PHPSESSID=8fd66d65b5b08513f3ac97c759780314
Dermot
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: e-voting-bounces at lists.stdlib.net
>>[mailto:e-voting-bounces at lists.stdlib.net]On Behalf Of adam beecher
>>Sent: 01 September 2004 15:01
>>To: e-voting at lists.stdlib.net
>>Subject: RE: [E-voting] Diebold voting machines vulnerability
>>
>>
>>It was still available only ten minutes ago. Probably a bit
>>previous to
>>speculate on it's disappearance at this stage.
>>
>>adam
>>
>>___________________________
>>BEECHER.NET - ICT Services
>>http://beecher.net/
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: e-voting-bounces at lists.stdlib.net
>>> [mailto:e-voting-bounces at lists.stdlib.net] On Behalf Of Fergal Daly
>>> Sent: 01 September 2004 14:46
>>> To: Casey, Dermot (GE Consumer Finance)
>>> Cc: e-voting at lists.stdlib.net
>>> Subject: Re: [E-voting] Diebold voting machines vulnerability
>>>
>>> Following that link or just going directly to
>>> blackboxvoting.org gives me a "welcome to your new website"
>>> page. No trace of the real site at all. It's time we all put
>>> on our tinfoil hats because I think they're about to switch
>>> on the orbital mind-control lasers :-)
>>>
>>> Seriously though, it's a bit of a coincidence that they break
>>> a story which implies Diebold put in a "rig the vote"
>>> backdoor and they suddenly disappear from the net. Court
>>> order against their ISP or something?
>>>
>>> F
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 09:16:15AM +0100, Casey, Dermot (GE
>>> Consumer Finance) wrote:
>>> > >From http://boingboing.net/
>>> >
>>> > Further evidence for the need for a VVAT!
>>> >
>>> > Diebold voting machines vulnerability
>>> > *Cory Doctorow*: Diebold's voting machines have a stunning
>>> security defect:
>>> >
>>> > Manipulation technique found in the Diebold central
>>tabulator --
>>> > 1,000 of these systems are in place, and they count up to two
>>> > million votes at a time.
>>> >
>>> > By entering a 2-digit code in a hidden location, a
>>second set of
>>> > votes is created. This set of votes can be changed, so
>>> that it no
>>> > longer matches the correct votes. The voting system
>>> will then read
>>> > the totals from the bogus vote set. It takes only
>>> seconds to change
>>> > the votes, and to date not a single location in the U.S. has
>>> > implemented security measures to fully mitigate the risks.
>>> >
>>> > This program is not "stupidity" or sloppiness. It was
>>> designed and
>>> > tested over a series of a dozen version adjustments.
>>> >
>>> > Link <http://www.blackboxvoting.org/?q=node/view/78> (/Thanks,
>>> > Michael!/) by Cory Doctorow on 31/08/2004 15:06
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > E-voting mailing list
>>> > E-voting at lists.stdlib.net
>>> > http://lists.stdlib.net/mailman/listinfo/e-voting
>>> > http://evoting.cs.may.ie/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> E-voting mailing list
>>> E-voting at lists.stdlib.net
>>> http://lists.stdlib.net/mailman/listinfo/e-voting
>>> http://evoting.cs.may.ie/
>>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>E-voting mailing list
>>E-voting at lists.stdlib.net
>>http://lists.stdlib.net/mailman/listinfo/e-voting
>>http://evoting.cs.may.ie/
>>
More information about the E-voting
mailing list