[E-voting] Minimum requirement to juge voting "technology"

[David GLAUDE]

Obviously there must be random check.
Fraud/Bug/Fault can take place without any doubt.

Now what is the minimum % of vote/presinct/voting-place to check?
What if there is a problem... starting with wich level of discrepency we 
do a full recount?
When do we make the random selection of the voting-place to check?
...

David GLAUDE

Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 11:26:30AM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> 
>>In my view, a paper trail should be available
>>for cases where there is a reasonable doubt about the outcome,
>>in much the same way that a recount is available now.
> 
> What is a reasonable doubt? Who arbitrates? How do you prevent
> nuisance abusers?

-- 
Member states shall ensure that data processing is not considered to
be a field of technology in the sense of patent law, and that
innovations in the field of data processing are not considered to be
inventions in the sense of patent law.