[E-voting] So much for firewalls,etc.

Rory McCann ebelular at gmail.com
Tue Aug 2 10:03:51 IST 2005

On 8/2/05, Nick Hilliard <nick at netability.ie> wrote:
> In this case, Cisco appears to have believed that the greater good would
> be served if the methodology used to exploit this particular
> vulnerability was not made public.

Not the greater good of humanity, the greater good of Cisco Systems
Inc. If they differ, that's when we must be on our guard.


More information about the E-voting mailing list