[E-voting] So much for firewalls,etc.

Rory McCann ebelular at gmail.com
Tue Aug 2 10:03:51 IST 2005


On 8/2/05, Nick Hilliard <nick at netability.ie> wrote:
> In this case, Cisco appears to have believed that the greater good would
> be served if the methodology used to exploit this particular
> vulnerability was not made public.

Not the greater good of humanity, the greater good of Cisco Systems
Inc. If they differ, that's when we must be on our guard.

<rory>



More information about the E-voting mailing list