[E-voting] Summary of Electronic Voting System Analysis
beddill at nas.com
Tue Dec 6 08:01:30 GMT 2005
We have two definitions of "overvote" going here
The USA definition is "Voting for both candidates, or both YES and NO on an
issue." A single voter on a single question makes an overvote. She might
not make an overvote on the other questions, and they would be tallied.
I read your definition of "overvote" as:
"more votes cast in a jurisdiction, than voters registered there"
Is my interpretation of your case correct?
At 12/5/2005 05:34 PM, Catherine Ansbro wrote:
>After our 2002 pilot we had an unnaturally high overvote at one polling
>place (e.g. more recorded votes than recorded voters) and an unnaturally
>high undervote at another polling place (fewer votes than voters). But
>I've never seen a graph showing this, with a comparison.
>Also, while one or both of these abnormal figures was supposedly
>reconciled in some way, I never heard the explanation or the impact on
>results. At the time, people just said it was procedural error with the
>Marian Beddill wrote:
>>At 12/5/2005 03:56 PM, you wrote:
>>>Undervote/overvote are more difficult to ascertain here because we have
>>>different classes of voters - ie. in 2004 Irish people could vote in the
>>>Referendum, EU citizens in the Euro-election and everyone could vote in
>>>the local elections. As far as I know, there is only a single class of
>>>voter in the US. There were reports at the time of people voting only in
>>>the referendum and not bothering about the elections.
>>Right. In the US, there is only a single class of voter. Either you are
>>- or you're not.
>>But in individual elections, voters in different locations
>>(jurisdictions) have different "questions" on which they are allowed to
>>vote. ("questions" is a term which includes issues and races.)
>>A resident within a City may vote on City issues, for example, while one
>>outside the city limits cannot. And there are a plethora of Districts, at
>>multiple levels of government.
>>"Overvotes" are not allowed. (Voting for both candidates, or both YES
>>and NO on an issue.) Exception, the IRV system is beginning to be allowed.
>>"Undervotes" are OK. And the data is reported for each individual
>>"question" on a ballot. Indeed, we have people who only mark votes for
>>the national races and ignore all the rest.
>>E-voting mailing list
>>E-voting at lists.stdlib.net
>E-voting mailing list
>E-voting at lists.stdlib.net
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.11/191 - Release Date: 12/2/2005
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the E-voting