Workable VVAT solutions [ was Re: [E-voting] Summary of meeting

[Margaret McGaley]

On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:52:24AM +0000, Adrian Colley wrote:
> > I think in future it is important to have a complete description of what
> > we consider an acceptable solution. Until you have this written down, you
> > cannot refute the point made by Mr R. I know we have tried to avoid
> > advocating a particular system but I think this is a weakness in our
> > position that needs to be fixed.

> I think you're right.  My personal criterion of "optical-scan, or some
> other VVAT that's just as good" has finally spiralled in on optical-scan
> itself.
> 

Ditto. I agree with Fergal that we need to have at least one (multiple would
be great) genuinely workable VVAT solution. I'll try to get around to writing
up a description of my personal favourite as soon as possible.

Margaret


-- 
Margaret McGaley
Margaret.McGaley at redbrick.dcu.ie
http://evoting.cs.may.ie