post-voting phase is not citizen controlled was [E-voting] terrorism and electronic elections

Catherine Ansbro cansbro at eircom.net
Mon Jul 11 20:15:11 IST 2005


I agree that it is more secure to count the ballots at the polling 
place.  That is not possible with our PR-STV system, since the 
preferences only have meaning when combined with all the other 
preferences in the larger voting area.

Catherine

Pierre Muller wrote:

> I should have been more accurate. Sorry. I first said "what happen once
> ballots are counted", then I should have said "post-counting phase". I 
> think it is robust, but not transparent at all.
>
> Catherine Ansbro a écrit :
>
>> In Ireland there is close public observation of the post-voting 
>> phase.  Perhaps except for when the ballot boxes are moved from the 
>> polling place to the count centre--and that is done via Garda 
>> (police) escort, at least in theory. 
>
> In France, ballots are counted in each polling place. Some consider it
> is more secure.
> I recently compared French and Italian electoral precedures, described
> here: http://www.electronic-vote.org/TERMINI/italians_en.php, this man
> doesn't only talk about TERRORISM ;-).
> Lots of details differ. But both look robust. And both could be 
> improved ?
>
>> The opening of the sealed boxes and all phases of counting are the 
>> subject of close scrutiny by the public. You should come over to 
>> observe our counting sometime.
>
> Well, I plan to visit Ireland some day... I will include an election day
> in my holidays :-)
>
> Pierre Muller
> webmestre de http://www.recul-democratique.org
> Citoyens sceptiques sur le vote électronique.
>
> _______________________________________________
> E-voting mailing list
> E-voting at lists.stdlib.net
> http://lists.stdlib.net/mailman/listinfo/e-voting
> http://evoting.cs.may.ie/
>
>




More information about the E-voting mailing list