post-voting phase is not citizen controlled
was [E-voting] terrorism and electronic elections
cansbro at eircom.net
Mon Jul 11 20:15:11 IST 2005
I agree that it is more secure to count the ballots at the polling
place. That is not possible with our PR-STV system, since the
preferences only have meaning when combined with all the other
preferences in the larger voting area.
Pierre Muller wrote:
> I should have been more accurate. Sorry. I first said "what happen once
> ballots are counted", then I should have said "post-counting phase". I
> think it is robust, but not transparent at all.
> Catherine Ansbro a écrit :
>> In Ireland there is close public observation of the post-voting
>> phase. Perhaps except for when the ballot boxes are moved from the
>> polling place to the count centre--and that is done via Garda
>> (police) escort, at least in theory.
> In France, ballots are counted in each polling place. Some consider it
> is more secure.
> I recently compared French and Italian electoral precedures, described
> here: http://www.electronic-vote.org/TERMINI/italians_en.php, this man
> doesn't only talk about TERRORISM ;-).
> Lots of details differ. But both look robust. And both could be
> improved ?
>> The opening of the sealed boxes and all phases of counting are the
>> subject of close scrutiny by the public. You should come over to
>> observe our counting sometime.
> Well, I plan to visit Ireland some day... I will include an election day
> in my holidays :-)
> Pierre Muller
> webmestre de http://www.recul-democratique.org
> Citoyens sceptiques sur le vote électronique.
> E-voting mailing list
> E-voting at lists.stdlib.net
More information about the E-voting