[E-voting] Aeroplane software fails

Adrian Colley aecolley at spamcop.net
Mon Oct 3 16:22:49 IST 2005

Long ago (2003-12-18), Henk Steentjes (CTO of Nedap) told the Oireachtas
Joint Committee on Environment and Local Government:
> This is a system that can register votes in a secure and safe way. A
> top-ranking testing institute tests the system.  When I came to
> Ireland from Schiphol Airport, I boarded an aeroplane and laid my life
> in hands of those operating the aircraft.  I did not ask to see the
> source code used by the authorities or ask how it was tested.  I trust
> Airbus, the manufacturer of the craft, and the FAA that certified the
> machine.

The latest Risks (http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/24.05.html#subj1.1)
refers to an incident two months ago on a Boeing 777 in which the
autopilots failed dramatically.  The day was saved only because the
pilots saw what was happening and were able to disengage the autopilots.
Extracts follow.

> An Australian Transport Safety Bureau report
> (http://www.atsb.gov.au/aviation/occurs/occurs_detail.cfm?ID=767)
> released yesterday reveals the pilot in command disconnected the
> autopilot and lowered the plane's nose to prevent a stall, after
> incorrect data from a supposedly fail-safe device caused the plane to
> pitch up and climb 3000ft, cutting its indicated air speed from 500kmh
> to 292kmh, activating a stall warning and a "stickshaker". [A
> stickshaker vibrates the aircraft's controls to warn the piot when he
> is approaching stall speed ... which, you know, means the plane is
> about to fall out of the air.]
> Boeing has told operators of the jet -- which by the way has the best
> safety record of any aircraft
> (http://www.geocities.com/khlim777_my/ashowsafe1.htm) -- to load a
> previous software version.

This is a good anecdote for use when someone brings up the "we trust
computers to fly aeroplanes, don't we?" objection to VVAT.


GPG 0x43D3AD19 17D2 CA6E A18E 1177 A361  C14C 29DB BA4B 43D3 AD19

More information about the E-voting mailing list