[E-voting] Compulsory voting
caburt at alphalink.com.au
Sun Sep 11 12:23:05 IST 2005
The caller was more candid than I might have implied, they did not open
the discussion identifying themselves. It was a guess on my part. Yes,
it is stupid. I think the use of REV might have precipitated it.
Still, I think coercion is a greater risk for EV. Bev Harris made a
point of finding and contacting Diebold staff to make the point that
they were easy to find. I think she found 16 technical people, from memory?
I'm surprised to read a citizen got a two year sentence for postal vote
personation. Perhaps it was not a first offence, or perhaps the
sentence was suspended. I wonder what the people in Birmingham got for
their part in postal fraud during the pilots recently.
Timothy Murphy wrote:
>On Sat 10 Sep 2005 23:22, Craig Burton wrote:
>>I work as an electoral returning officer in private or union elections.
>>I have received phone calls asking me how much I charge to throw the
>>election. It is usually one of the political parties.
>This strikes me as an incredibly stupid -
>almost unbelievably stupid - thing to do.
>You might perfectly well be recording the conversation.
>(I think this if often done automatically with VoIP systems.)
>Fraud in elections is quite a serious offence.
>I knew a case in the UK where a doctor got a 2-year sentence
>for sending in a postal vote in his daughter's name.
>(The daughter reported him.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the E-voting