[E-voting] public transportation fares reduced on voting day

Craig Burton caburt at alphalink.com.au
Thu Sep 15 02:27:21 IST 2005

Like jury duty someone also should vet who is selected.  I see some risk 
in picking people who oppose the process or who are too disinterested.   
Even the simple worker role requires some skill and patience and ability 
to deal with the public.
OTOH random selection of the staff improves the process as it becomes 
harder for any number of partisan actors to enlist for a specific 
polling station.
Here people apply to do the poll station work and are paid.  I believe 
they are vetted as well.

Michael McMahon wrote:

> vote at electronic-vote.org wrote:
>> We still have the legal right to be absent from work if we are 
>> choosen as polling stations workers. Infact local administrations 
>> randomly choose polling workers among all voting citizen, and such 
>> work is compulsory and it is paid by the State (120 euro for each 
>> simple worker and about 200 for each President).
> Choosing election workers from the electorate at random seems like an
> interesting idea, similar to jury-service I guess (but better 
> compensated).
> It also seems like a good way to engage people with the process.
> I think David G. said that workers are chosen randomly in Belgium also.
> I don't know how it is done in Ireland (or anywhere else for that 
> matter).
> Michael
> _______________________________________________
> E-voting mailing list
> E-voting at lists.stdlib.net
> http://lists.stdlib.net/mailman/listinfo/e-voting
> http://evoting.cs.may.ie/

More information about the E-voting mailing list