[E-voting] E-voting machines to be used in 2009 despite warnings
Ciaran Quinn
election at polarbears.com
Tue Oct 17 23:13:41 IST 2006
Aengus Lawlor wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:59 AM [EDT],
> Aengus Lawlor <aengusl at eircom.net> wrote:
>
>> ... If FF are
>> in power after the next election, he'll ram the project through
>> whatever committee is supposed to deal with the issue (just as Cullen
>> did). He might spend a million or two on cosmetic changes to muddy
>> the waters and win over public opinion (they won't know how effective
>> or otherwise such changes are), but as far as he is concerned, the
>> machines are a perfectly acceptable solution today,
>
> And a quote from todays Order of Business:
> The Taoiseach: "We have to correct the software, which will cost
> €500,000 and try to move forward. Otherwise, this country will move
> into the 21st century being a laughing stock with our stupid old
> pencils".
>
> I guess I was wrong - they don't think they'll even need to spend "a
> million or two".
>
> Unfortunately, if the opposition insist on going on about the "wasted"
> 52 million, instead of the threat to the integrity and secrecy of
> Irish elections, they'll hand FF a victory, not just on this issue,
> but in the General election too. It's easy for FF to "save" the wasted
> money, if the public think that that's the problem. It'll be far
> harder for them to protect the integrity of the eections, if the pubic
> can be convinced that that's what is really at stake here. They've had
> a couple of years to break FFs back on this issue, but they're still
> recycling the same old sound bites, and they clearly haven't done a
> whit of new research into the issue.
Should ICTE have a position in the election campaign? Should ICTE ask
voters to vote only for those parties which promise to scrap
Nedap-Powervote? Should ICTE produce and publicise a list of parties who
support ICTE's principles?
Ciaran
More information about the E-voting
mailing list