[E-voting] Re: Novel approach to reducing electoral fraud

[Keith Martin]

If you're the second voter of the day, aren't you then guaranteed to  
get the first voter's ballot?  Plus, what ballot does the first voter  
of the day get?

Even if there's a delay mechanism to prevent that, early voters are  
still far more likely to be able to identify whose vote they have  
received to check.



> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:36:55 +0000
> From: Michael McMahon <Michael.McMahon at Sun.COM>
> Subject: Re: [E-voting] Novel approach to reducing electoral fraud
> To: e-voting at lists.stdlib.net
>
> It certainly is an interesting approach, but
> being able to select a ballot randomly (to be copied and taken away)
> sounds simple enough in principle, yet it could be quite tricky
> in practice.
----- End message from e-voting-request at lists.stdlib.net -----