[E-voting] Re: Novel approach to reducing electoral fraud

Keith Martin keith at keith.gs
Wed Jan 16 12:29:16 GMT 2008


If you're the second voter of the day, aren't you then guaranteed to  
get the first voter's ballot?  Plus, what ballot does the first voter  
of the day get?

Even if there's a delay mechanism to prevent that, early voters are  
still far more likely to be able to identify whose vote they have  
received to check.



> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:36:55 +0000
> From: Michael McMahon <Michael.McMahon at Sun.COM>
> Subject: Re: [E-voting] Novel approach to reducing electoral fraud
> To: e-voting at lists.stdlib.net
>
> It certainly is an interesting approach, but
> being able to select a ballot randomly (to be copied and taken away)
> sounds simple enough in principle, yet it could be quite tricky
> in practice.
----- End message from e-voting-request at lists.stdlib.net -----





More information about the E-voting mailing list