[E-voting] Interesting ....

Fergus O'Rourke sitecom at tinet.ie
Mon Jan 21 14:31:24 GMT 2008

>From Bradblog (http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5544) via the Lenz blog

"Analysts at the Election Defense Alliance (EDA) have confirmed that based
on the official results on the New Hampshire Secretary of state web site,
there is a remarkable relationship between Obama and Clinton votes, when you
look at votes tabulated by op-scan v. votes tabulated by hand:

  Clinton Optical scan 91,717 52.95%
  Obama Optical scan 81,495 47.05%

  Clinton Hand-counted 20,889 47.05%
  Obama Hand-counted 23,509 52.95%

The percentages appear to be swapped. That seems highly unusual, to say the
least." (Bradblog)

"If those numbers hold up to scrutiny, the people who have fine-tuned the
results of this particular election obviously want to be caught. That rules
out giving the Clinton machine credit for the operation, since they would
not be so dumb as to practically openly announce their tampering." (Lenz)

Read the full articles for maximum impact.

(Not just law stuff)

More information about the E-voting mailing list