[Sysadmins] Eircom DNS
jm at jmason.org
Wed Jul 8 17:36:09 IST 2009
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 16:40, James Raftery<james at now.ie> wrote:
> While it's good that OpenDNS is, err, open about its operational policies
> I'm not convinced the average home user is equipped to evaluate the
> consequences of OpenDNS's shenanigans. ``They tell you what they're
> doing'' doesn't make everything OK.
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:20:07AM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
>> It would be good if OS providers shipped systems with local,
>> recursive, caching DNS resolvers enabled by default. DNSSec will make
>> that less important one day, but it's probably still a good few years
> Oh god. You're kidding, right? A full-service resolver in every desktop PC?
> DNS puts stubs in end machines for a good reason: lack of expertise at the
> edge. Putting more DNS foo into the hands of more ppl who have no idea what
> to do with it doesn't strike me as a good idea. Hell, we're talking about
> this because, it would appear, that even organisations that have DNS as a
> core service don't get it right. I expect my mother would fare a lot worse.
Hi everyone! ;)
I have to agree with Paul. I've routinely installed recursive DNS
servers on all my laptops/desktops/servers for several years and it's
been painless, with zero admin overhead. (well, modulo Linux distro
packaging bugs and BIND memory hog behaviour when faced with
In my experience the benefits far outweigh the downsides, and I think
that would apply for nontechie users. There's actually less config
required if you run the server locally, since there's then no need to
specify upstream DNS addresses....
More information about the Sysadmins